I really feel for the queen. Why should she be having to deal with all this upset at 95 its awful. Sadly two weak sons not wothy of the Monarchy William would be the better person. Heaven forbid if Charles had a coronary...
Let's be honest - monarchy is a charade played out for tourists, it has no place in the 21st century. And neither do Lords, barons and the rest that historically obtained their family positions through violence and beating down the rest of us in a protection racket the mafia would be proud of.
Actually I think the monarchy plays an important rôle in stabilizing the country. The pageantry is for the tourists but it really does go deeper than that.
I’m not at all a royalist but I do think the queen has a bit more respect for her ‘subjects’ to at least try to uphold some semblance of following the rules. Do you think Phillip would have accidentally shot Andrew if he was still alive? the queen may do it yet?
To be fair, she has to, she knows very well her position is untenable in the modern world. She can't send her private army of thugs out to quell dissenters these days, or chop their heads off and all that.
I think you may be a few centuries out of date, Steve . Do people still wear ruffs and hose round your way?
it is a shame, but his behaviour didn’t happen in her 95th year. It occurred 20+ years ago when, 2 of her 3 sons were “ men behaving badly “ and the third was trying to cash in by promoting celebrity / royal “ It’s A Knockout “. She or Philip or the establishment should have got a grip then. I’m neither a Royalist nor anti Royal but …by eck ..they need a bloody good shake up. William seems decent but he has a lot on his plate to remedy the tarnished image of his father and his fathers siblings ( Anne excluded….apart from her appearance in Its A Knockout “
Really? The only acts the monarchy has displayed to “ unite “ the country seems to be the deaths and funeral services for Diana and Philip. I am not anti Royalist but …bloody hell they don’t do anything proactively meaningful.